Before any team can exploit the rules, it must know the rules. To that end, I recommend that coaches serve as referees during scrimmages, which should be the primary activity at practices. In this way coaches will become intimately and practically familiar with what referees do during games. This will enable them to converse or dispute, as the case may be, with the officials during games. They should have personal copies of the current official rules and learn exactly how they are worded and what they mean and imply, including the ambiguities and uncertainties they contain.
It is one thing for a coach to run "ladder drills," also called "suicides," and other various drills, and thereby exhaust the players, and something else entirely to run fast-paced scrimmages. What is the difference? The difference is that scrimmaging is playing basketball, and playing basketball is fun. Drills are not fun. And a player's style and stamina develop and are esteemed differently in the context of fun than in the context of drudgery. When a coach orders a time-out in a game, why must he always the proceed to use that time to lecture his players and diagram plays? Why doesn't he, at least occasionally, attend to other business, such as conversing with officials or other coaches, and simply allow his five to rest and contemplate and catch their breath? By lecturing them, isn't he implying that he knows better than they do what needs to be done to securate advantage, which a) sometimes may not be the case, and b) even if he does know better, he is making puppets of his players, demoralizing them, by taking away from them their own initiative -- devaluing their own immediate ideas and impulses that come to mind in the midst of the unforeseeable action on the court. Instruct the players at practices before and after games, but let them play according to their own lights in the actual games.